There is an organisation of religious people who have links in all fields of occupation and they surround, monitor and manipulate those who are not believers in religion and those who do not conform to their ways or standards of behaviour, systems or openly speak against religion, they also monitor individuals who act out of the ordinary. They surround these individuals, make them uncomfortable, then plant negative ideologies in their head such as murder, theft, and other acts which are considered illegal or sinful by standards of religious law such as homosexuality, if anyone does not agree with their ways they try to lead them down the wrong path or influence them to commit wrong or immoral actions in order to make an example of them, send them to confinement ( jail / prison ) and away from society or drive them into insanity.
They use a variety of tactics to influence these individuals such as the following
Hypnotism, also known as hypnosis, is a psychological phenomenon in which an individual enters a state of focused attention and heightened suggestibility, often accompanied by deep relaxation or discomfort depending on the aim of the hypnotiser. Contrary to popular portrayals that depict hypnosis as a form of mind control, modern psychology understands hypnotism as a cooperative process in which the participant remains aware and retains agency throughout. The hypnotic state is characterised by reduced or increased peripheral awareness and an increased responsiveness to verbal or physical suggestions, imagery, and internal experiences.
From a cognitive and neuroscientific perspective, hypnosis is associated with changes in brain activity, particularly in regions linked to attention, self-awareness, and executive control. Neuroimaging studies suggest altered connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and other brain areas, which may explain why hypnotised individuals can experience suggested sensations, such as reduced pain or vivid imagery as subjectively real. Importantly, not all individuals are equally hypnotisable; susceptibility varies and is influenced by factors such as absorption, expectancy, and motivation.
Despite its benefits, hypnotism remains surrounded by misconceptions and ethical considerations. Stage hypnosis and media representations often exaggerate its effects, fostering the false belief that hypnotised individuals can be compelled to act against their will. Ethical practice in hypnotherapy requires informed consent, professional training, and clear therapeutic goals to ensure client wellbeing.
In conclusion, hypnotism is a scientifically recognised altered state of consciousness with meaningful applications in psychology and medicine. When understood and applied correctly, it offers valuable insight into the flexibility of human awareness and the power of suggestion in shaping perception, emotion, and behaviour. Hypnotism is making an individual believe that external stimuli is related to internal processing or behaviour. It can be used to alter individuals
Sensory and Associative Conditioning:
Influence can begin with simple associations. Advertisers and propagandists routinely pair products, symbols or messages with positive sensory stimuli so that the target subconsciously links them. For example, colour schemes, music and imagery are chosen to evoke specific moods and biases. Research on colour psychology notes that different hues reliably influence mood, attention and even physiological responses verywellmind.com. Marketers exploit this by using audio logos or jingles. short, memorable tunes or sounds – which “positively differentiate a product or service, enhancing recall, creating preference, [and] building trust”en.wikipedia.org. In practice, a soft drink company might use warm, energetic reds and upbeat music to suggest excitement, while a spa service uses cool blues and gentle sounds for calmness. These multisensory cues work via classical conditioning: people come to associate a brand or idea with the feeling elicited by the stimulus psychologytoday.comverywellmind.com. Over time, the mere sight of a logo colour or the first notes of a jingle can trigger automatic positive (or negative) feelings, commands or movements in an individual, subtly steering opinions, choices and actions verywellmind.comen.wikipedia.org.
Framing, Perception and Distraction:
The way information is presented (“framed”) critically shifts perception. Psychologists find that equivalent facts can lead to different decisions when worded positively or negatively. In one study, consumers exposed to a positively framed message showed higher purchase intent than those given the same content in negative terms pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Similarly, media and speakers often use rhetorical framing or selective emphasis (e.g. stressing losses vs. gains) to nudge beliefs. At the same time, diverting attention is a classic manipulation technique. Chomsky’s “strategy of distraction” highlights how flooding the audience with trivia or sensationalism draws focus away from important issues demenzemedicinagenerale.net. For example, politicians or media may amplify celebrity gossip or crisis coverage to divert scrutiny from policy mistakes. Illusions and cognitive tricks (such as the framing effect or confirmation bias) exploit innate brain shortcuts: people tend to accept information that fits their current narrative and ignore counter-evidence. Skilled persuaders use these biases by presenting data in a confusing way (e.g. complex statistics to obscure facts) or by creating superficial “illusions” of consensus or choice. In short, controlling context and narrative, by framing, analogy or misdirection can shift individual perception of an issue without ever changing the underlying facts.
Gradual Commitment and Timing:
Influence often works through a step-by-step build-up. One classic tactic is the foot-in-the-door: start with a very small request, get compliance, and then gradually escalate to the real request psychologistworld.com. For instance, a charity might first ask someone to sign a petition (a trivial act) and later ask for a donation. Psychologists explain this by “commitment and consistency”: once an individual agrees to something, they see themselves as the kind of person who complies, making them more likely to agree to larger requests: psychologistworld.com. A related Chomsky strategy is the “gradual approach” – imposing radical changes or ideas slowly so each step seems acceptable demenzemedicinagenerale.net. Effective timing is also crucial: messages timed to emotional moments (e.g. holiday jingles, crisis announcements) or when attention is high can dramatically increase impact. By meticulously planning when and how a message is delivered (and by breaking it into digestible steps), manipulators can nudge individuals toward a desired outcome almost imperceptibly. Over time, this can lead a person to adopt new beliefs or behaviors (such as supporting a cause or behaving a certain way) without realising how they were swayed.
Surveillance, Monitoring and Pattern Targeting:
Knowing that individuals change behavior when watched, modern influence campaigns leverage surveillance. Psychological studies show that simply believing “someone is watching” makes most people conform to expected norms axios.comaxios.com. In the digital age, platforms and employers literally track individuals’ every move, from location and purchases to web searches. As Axios reports, “the point of surveillance is to track and influence people’s behaviour”axios.com; in fact, nearly half of people say they would change their behaviour if they knew they were being monitored axios.com. Data-driven “pattern recognition” lets algorithms identify an individual’s fears, values and vulnerabilities. Companies (and political actors) then micro-target ads or content that resonate personally. For example, sophisticated profiling (like the techniques blamed on Cambridge Analytica) builds psychological profiles from online data and then tests which messages most effectively nudge that person. Recent research describes this as a “digital influence machine”: a suite of surveillance, targeting, and automated decision tools that weaponise personal data to push the individual’s buttons frontiersin.org. In practice, this means social media feeds become personalised echo chambers: the ads and posts each person sees are tailored in real time to maximise emotional impact (e.g. by highlighting news or offers at moments of vulnerability). The combination of monitoring and AI-driven targeting ensures that influence is not broadcasted en masse, but surgically applied to individuals based on their unique profiles frontiersin.org.
Media Manipulation and Social Engineering:
Mass media, education and social networks are powerful levers to sway individual minds. “Media manipulation” refers to organised campaigns that exploit TV, internet and news platforms to mislead or steer public opinions in the chosen direction of the advertiser en.wikipedia.org. Tactics here include spreading disinformation or propaganda, using sensational headlines, and inundating audiences with biased narratives en.wikipedia.org. For instance, a media outlet might continuously highlight crime stories to instill fear or repeatedly broadcast slogans to cement a political ideology. Social engineering (in a broader sense) applies psychological tricks to influence people online or in everyday life. Criminal hackers use social engineering to trick individuals into giving up data, exploiting emotions like fear or curiosity mdpi.com. Similarly, marketing and political campaigns “exploit specific human attributes and psychology” to bypass logical resistance mdpi.com. On an individual level, this can mean tailored email pitches that flatter the recipient or phishing scams that mimic authority figures. In education, “distorted learning” can occur when curricula or online content are biased, teaching only one side of an issue to mold students’ beliefs. In all these media-driven methods, the principle is the same: control the storyline. If people are repeatedly fed one-sided information (or exposed to persuasive framing with no counterpoints), they gradually come to accept it as true because it is the only piece of information available to them, in other words only 1 side of the coin is visible to them.
Nonverbal and Hypnotic Cues:
Human communication is not just verbal, body language, tone and even subtle mimicry can powerfully influence. Skilled persuaders use mirroring (copying someone’s posture, gestures or speech rhythms) to create rapport and trust. Social neuroscience shows that this automatic mimicry – the “chameleon effect” – makes partners feel more synchronised and cooperative pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. For example, a friendly salesperson who subtly matches your stance and nods earns your goodwill, making you more receptive to their pitch. This principle is also a foundation of informal hypnosis techniques: by aligning breathing patterns or tone of voice with a subject, a persuader can manipulate someone into a suggestible state. Even simple eye contact and body openness (e.g. uncrossed arms, forward lean) can make a message seem more credible. In essence, when individuals “see themselves” reflected in the communicator, their guard lowers. Mirroring and pacing others’ nonverbal cues is thus a potent way to unconsciously hypnotise consent or compliance from a target.
Symbolic and Coded Communication:
Messages can carry hidden or symbolic meanings that bypass rational analysis. Political “dog-whistles” are a prime example: phrases that seem innocuous on the surface but carry a covert signal to a subgroup vox.com. For instance, saying “urban renewal” might literally refer to city planning, but it can be a coded appeal to racial prejudice for those attuned to its subtext. Symbols (logos, images, colours) work similarly by tapping into shared cultural or emotional associations. A red-white-and-blue backdrop may unconsciously evoke patriotism, or a skull symbol can silently suggest danger. In cults or extremist groups, even numbers or hand signs become secret codes that affirm in-group identity. By embedding a message in symbols, a communicator can speak on two levels at once: the general audience hears a bland statement, while a targeted individual picks up on the deeper meaning. This “coded language” can also appear in advertising (brands using ancient symbols to suggest timelessness) or in jokes/memes, where insiders laugh at the hidden reference. Ultimately, symbolism and codes wield influence by making recipients feel “chosen” or part of a narrative they don’t fully articulate, harnessing subconscious biases and tribal loyalties without explicit argument .
Information Control and Selective Disclosure:
What people don’t know can influence them as much as what they do. Gatekeepers of information (governments, corporations, institutions) can shape belief by withholding, censoring, or only releasing selective facts. For example, news editors decide which stories to cover (omitting unfavorable data), and textbooks may present history from a narrow viewpoint. By controlling the context and volume of information, manipulators create an environment where the individual’s perspective is subtly guided. When opposing viewpoints are suppressed or drowned out, people often remain unaware of missing pieces and assume the official narrative is the whole truth. Likewise, intermediaries might “spin” facts or use euphemisms to downplay negativity (e.g. calling budget cuts “efficiency measures”), quietly persuading individuals through omission and language. In marketing, this appears as “fine print” or hidden fees, only if consumers dig deep do they discover the reality. Thus, discretion and control over information flow (whether by censorship, selective education or algorithmic filtering) is a powerful lever: it narrows the choices and viewpoints an individual considers, channelling them toward the desired conclusion without overt persuasion.
Incentives, Rewards and Reciprocity:
Material or social rewards can directly influence choices. Many strategies rely on the human desire for gain or fear of loss. For instance, offering a small gift or favor (like a free trial) often compels reciprocity, people feel obligated to return the favor by buying or supporting something. Employers and marketers tap this by giving discounts, loyalty points, or exclusive offers to sway customers. Even subtle incentives like social recognition (“likes,” badges, or status symbols) motivate behaviour by rewarding it. Crucially, the timing and framing of incentives matter: a limited-time offer creates urgency, while higher-priced “premium” versions confer prestige. By aligning desirable outcomes (money, status, comfort) with the target behaviour, influence agents make the rational choice seem aligned with self-interest. This economic dimension can also mean monetising attention: for example, social media platforms reward users for engagement (which manipulates content to maximise time spent), effectively paying them in entertainment so users stay “hooked.” In all cases, adding a tangible or socially meaningful reward steers individuals’ decisions by appealing to immediate personal benefit.
Interrogation and Information Gathering:
When influencing a single individual, sometimes the goal is to extract information. Interrogators use psychological tactics (like building rapport, using friendly vs. confrontational styles, or exploiting stress responses) to make people disclose information. Simple techniques include the “friendly confessor” (pretending to empathise or admit guilt oneself) or posing as an ally to lower defenses. Even everyday questioners (salesmen, investigators) use similar methods: asking open-ended questions, mirroring the subject’s tone, or bringing up past admissions to elicit more detail. While formal interrogation can border on coercion, at a basic level it’s an influence process: by carefully choosing what to reveal and how to phrase questions, the questioner plants ideas and gradually gets the interviewee to “volunteer” key facts. In this way, interrogators steer a conversation so that the individual unwittingly confirms or reveals the answers desired without the interviewer asking the question directly.
Academic Study and Self-Protection:
Scholars have long studied these influence techniques to understand, use and guard against them. For example, inoculation theory shows that exposing people to weakened forms of persuasion or manipulation techniques can build “mental antibodies” meaning mental defence mechanisms which by slowly exposing an individual to the any of the following manipulation techniques strengthens the mind against such techniques en.wikipedia.org. In practice, teaching individuals about common fallacies and giving them practice counter-arguments can reduce the impact of future manipulative messages. Media literacy and critical thinking curricula use this approach: by pre-emptively refuting propaganda points, students become more skeptical of biased news. Social analysis also helps identify macro-patterns (like filter bubbles) so platforms can be designed to minimise undue bias. On an individual level, awareness of one’s own cognitive biases (confirmation bias, herd behaviour) is key to self-protection. Learning to question emotionally charged messages, fact-check unfamiliar claims, and seek alternative sources can break the spell of subtle influence. In sum, the same psychological principles that enable manipulation can be studied and countered by research, turning academic insight into personal defence.
Modern Digital Applications:
In today’s world, many of these tactics have new high-tech avatars. Social media algorithms exploit attention and association (showing brighter colours, movement and novelty) to hijack focus. Data analytics fuel “smart” persuasion, targeting individuals with personalised ads or newsfeeds tuned to their profile (a technique dubbed “digital psy-ops”) frontiersin.org. Even AI chatbots and voice assistants can be programmed to use mirroring and emotional language to influence users. Ultimately, all these methods center on the individual: each person’s data, context and psychology is leveraged to tailor the influence. Up-to-date research (e.g. on Cambridge Analytica’s methods frontiersin.org or on AI-driven media filtering) confirms that modern influence is micro-targeted, adaptive and often invisible to its targets. By understanding these deep, research-backed techniques, both analysts and everyday individuals can better recognise when their thoughts and actions are being steered and take steps to maintain autonomy.
Testimony
In my own personal experience, this organisation had been watching me for about 2 years, they planted ideas such as murder in my head, they observed my behaviour and learnt about me, they got to know me well through undercover friends of mine, they began by using visual cues such as recognisable bags and brands so that i could tell them apart from ordinary people and they could communicate various messages to me through these brands and bags, they used illusions in order to make me think that i am seeing things. Then most recently my parents were lied to and i was first drugged with (morphine), interrogated and shown 2 individuals whilst intoxicated in the night in order to make me think that i am seeing entities; this occurred on a saturday night just so on the following sunday when we go to church i would think i am having psychological hallucinations and i would accept God. I did not understand what was happening at the time then i was taken to Iran for the first time of going back for a holiday or so i thought. I was made to believe my parents were being hypnotised, which made me act in a hostile manner towards those around because the natural reaction is to protect your loved ones. Then i realised that because my parents were lied to they started to dislike me and where ever we stayed i was deprived of sleep, i was told to sleep in a certain manner for example on my left side communicated through this morse code. I was made to believe i am in a spy recruitment plan so that i would go along with what was happening. They understood my pattern of behaviour and speech by this point and they understood that i am sound sensitive they used different frequencies of sound to communicate different messages to me and to build associations to behaviours and things that are considered good or bad in order to steer my behaviour pattern in the direction they want. I was taught a form of sign language (morse code) which was used with the understanding of human speech patterns to communicate different topics to me and i was taught to communicate back. Through this sign language we could then communicate, however no one would ever acknowledge that this morse code / sign language was real. Planned routes were taken each time we would travel and individuals from this religious organisation would surround us in order to either make me think i am going crazy or to make me think it is all in my head and through the feeling of unsafety they desired for me to commit an illegal action so they could either hospitalise me or put me in prison. Each night when I would sleep a certain frequency of sound was tuned to my tossing and turning in my sleep therefore I would associate that sound with moving and things they wanted me to believe were repeated in my ears through this morse code. Alongside this feeling of unsafety, hypnosis was then used in order to make my nervous system sensitive and to make me associate the movements of the hands of others with my own, causing shaking and twitching of the hands upon certain visual and audio stimuli such as certain sounds and movements. Slowly through all this understanding of my behaviour and the creation of association with hand movements they wished to make my hands sensitive to questioning for lie detection and demanded hand relaxation for hand held object dropping. I was deprived of sleep in order to make me believe it was unreal and to push me towards criminal actions so I could be arrested. Each time they would push me towards an emotional state in order to make each hypnotism session more effective, i was then put on house arrest for some days however they made sure i got plenty of sunlight and food so nobody would notice i have been put under emotional and psychological stress, colour association was also used to make links between behaviour patterns they wished me to have such as praying being green and negative or undesirable behaviours being red. This signal language would be used to try and plant negative ideologies in my thoughts and to corrupt my thinking pattern and clarity. They used my right ear and left ear for different associative patterns of sound in order to create different trigger mechanisms (meaning sound A would trigger memory A or pattern A) . The times of day when azan is sang (prayer time) was the only time of day when the signalling would stop in order to further create the illusion that this was in my head and to try and influence me towards conversion to Islam to put an end to this psychological stress.
They monitor and surveil these individuals ( those who do not believe in religion and those who do not conform to their ways or standards of behaviour, systems, those who openly speak against religion, individuals who act out of the ordinary ) this organisations has threatened me using this morse code countless times, they have links in all fields of occupation and can enter the lives of almost anyone.
This organisation is made up of mostly Christians, Jews and Muslims with other religious minorities.
Reference list
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. Horace Liveright.
(Foundational work on mass persuasion and symbolic communication)
Braid, J. (1843). Neurypnology; or, the rationale of nervous sleep. Churchill.
(Historical grounding for hypnotic and attentional states)
Cialdini, R. B. (2021). Influence: Science and practice (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Chomsky, N. (1997). Media control: The spectacular achievements of propaganda. Seven Stories Press.
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann.
Friesen, W. V., & Ekman, P. (2003). Unmasking the face. Malor Books.
(Body language, nonverbal influence, and emotional signaling)
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–100.
(Relevant to perception framing and behavioral nudging)
Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., & Hallquist, M. N. (2008). Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis, 111–139. American Psychological Association.
Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12714–12719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710966114
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.
(Human response to symbolic and behavioral mirroring)
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Secker & Warburg.
(Conceptual foundation for surveillance and information control)
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance. Palgrave Communications, 5, Article 65.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
Roozenbeek, J., Traberg, C. S., & van der Linden, S. (2022). Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation. Royal Society Open Science, 9(5), 211719.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211719
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203–218.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Leave a Reply